JURIST

OCTOBER 6, 2022

The lower court decision ruled that DACA was illegally created and prevented any further applicants but allowed nearly 600,000 young immigrants to renew their status under the program. The post DACA program illegal under administrative law, US appeals court says appeared first on JURIST - News.

Administrative Law 222

Administrative Law Court Laws Immigration 222

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 14, 2023

Share The nation’s immigration courts are breaking under the cumulative weight of a byzantine statutory scheme, chronic understaffing, and insurmountable case backlogs. She was detained and subsequently applied for a type of humanitarian relief known as “withholding of removal” under the Immigration & Nationality Act.

Immigration 76

Immigration Court Government Statute 76

Attorney at Work

MARCH 14, 2022

That could be anything from an immigration petition to a blue sky filing. Just as “administrative law” is an umbrella term for numerous practice specialties, most practice areas comprise multiple niches. Have you positively decided on a niche? Click through to see the schedule of topics.

Education 116

Education Legal Legal Lawyer 116

Customs & International Trade Law

APRIL 29, 2022

Immigration and Customs Enforcement-Homeland Security Investigations (ICE-HSI) special agents for further investigation. A total of twelve packages with a total of $114,294 of undeclared currency was discovered on her person, which was then seized by CBP. The subject was arrested, and the case was turned over to U.S.

Laws 87

Laws Drafting Calendaring Administrative Law 87

Customs & International Trade Law

AUGUST 26, 2022

On August 21, CBP announced McAllen Border Patrol Station agents attempted to initiate an immigration inspection of the occupants of a vehicle departing a well-known migrant loading area in Los Ebanos. The program will further expand to Vancouver in late September, bringing MPC availability to 38 air and seaport locations.

Laws 52

Laws Immigration Administrative Law Attorney 52

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 29, 2023

1252(a)(2)(D) bars review of an asserted question of law where a noncitizen has challenged the Board of Immigration Appeals’ interpretation of the statutory extreme hardship standard found at 8 U.S.C. relisted after the June 22 conference) Bystron v. Garland , 22-617 Issues : (1) Whether 8 U.S.C.

Immigration 79

Immigration Court Government Laws 79

SCOTUSBlog

MARCH 31, 2023

To enforce these laws, Congress created the SEC. It granted the agency the power to regulate investors through either lawsuits in federal court or internal hearings in front of an administrative law judge, or ALJ. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Diaz-Rodriguez v.

Immigration 97

Immigration Administrative Law Government Court 97

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 21, 2022

During the week of June 13, the Supreme Court decided two immigration cases (involving bond hearings for noncitizens in immigration detention) and declined to decide a third (involving the Trump-era “public charge” policy for green card applicants). The post An important week for immigration law appeared first on SCOTUSblog.

Immigration 88

Immigration Laws Administrative Law Court 88

JURIST

JUNE 12, 2022

A US federal judge Friday granted a request to dismiss a policy by President Joe Biden’s administration that narrows the detaining and deportation of immigrants. ” The opinion continues to state that the memo violates “a foundational principle of administrative law.”

Immigration 104

Immigration Administrative Law Court Laws 104

JURIST

OCTOBER 3, 2022

He reminded his audience that “it was in our 2019 Manifesto that we laid out what we will update in the Human Rights Act and administrative law to ensure that there is a proper balance between the rights of individuals, our vital national security and effective government.”.

Laws 183

Laws Government Legal Services Immigration 183

SCOTUSBlog

FEBRUARY 10, 2022

Orthwein distinguished professor of law at Washington University in St. He is coauthor of a casebook on administrative law and has written many articles on that subject. There has never been any mystery about the jurisprudential premises of Justice Stephen Breyer’s approach to issues of public law. Similarly, in Lucia v.

Administrative Law 107

Administrative Law Laws Statute Government 107

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 29, 2022

Share The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Tuesday in a challenge to a Biden administration policy that prioritizes certain groups of unauthorized immigrants for arrest and deportation. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, representing the Biden administration, echoed Kagan’s sentiments.

Immigration 107

Immigration Government Court Administrative Law 107

JonathanTurley

DECEMBER 2, 2020

The Court’s last term resulted in groundbreaking decisions in far-flung areas – from immigration, employment and LGBTQ rights to administrative law and separation of powers. Here is the description of the event which will occur around 4:45 pm ET.

Law School 32

Law School Laws Court Immigration 32

The Crime Report

OCTOBER 12, 2021

But a Stanford University researcher argues that basing deportation decisions of immigrants on the level of criminality without looking at the length of time they have been in the U.S. disrupts families and turns immigration services into a vehicle for crime control. longer, they are disrupting families with stronger ties to the U.S.,

Immigration 105

Immigration Laws Felony Attorney 105

JURIST

FEBRUARY 21, 2022

The Biden administration seeks a declaration that it may cease enforcement of the “Remain in Mexico” immigration policy first implemented by former President Trump. First, the Trump administration relied on 8 USC § 1225(b)(2)(C) to institute the MPP. Respondent must file their brief on April 7, 2022.

Immigration 161

Immigration Court Government Administrative Law 161

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 7, 2022

immigration court. After Texas and Missouri challenged that decision, a federal district court vacated the secretary’s termination, in part on the administrative-law ground that the decision was insufficiently explained. solicitor general argues that the statutory basis for the Trump administration’s policy, 8 U.S.C.

Laws 126

Laws Immigration Court Administrative Law 126

JURIST

MARCH 10, 2021

The Attorneys General of Arizona and Montana filed an amended a joint lawsuit Monday alleging that the Biden administration has violated immigration and administrative law. The allegations arise from changes to policies governing the detention and deportation of undocumented immigrants.

Immigration 178

Immigration Attorney Administrative Law Laws 178

SCOTUSBlog

AUGUST 20, 2021

Share The Biden administration on Friday asked the Supreme Court for an immediate reprieve from having to reinstate a Trump-era program known as the “remain in Mexico” policy, which requires asylum seekers at the U.S.-Mexico immigration court. Mexico border to stay in Mexico while they wait for a hearing in U.S.

Immigration 104

Immigration Government Court Administrative Law 104

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 28, 2022

Share The Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Tuesday in a dispute over the Biden administration’s authority to set immigration policy. Texas and Louisiana are challenging a federal policy that prioritizes certain groups of unauthorized immigrants for arrest and deportation, arguing that it violates federal law.

Immigration 104

Immigration Government Healthcare Court 104

SCOTUSBlog

OCTOBER 7, 2022

Last term, the court dismissed as improvidently granted, or “DIG”ed , a case brought by Republican-controlled states challenging the government’s repeal of a Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule. The post Litigation continues over public charge immigration rule appeared first on SCOTUSblog.

Immigration 85

Immigration Litigation Litigating Administrative Law 85

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 15, 2022

Share The Supreme Court on Wednesday threw out an effort by Arizona and 12 other states with Republican attorneys general to defend a contentious Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule after the Biden administration refused to do so. The case, Arizona v.

Immigration 94

Immigration Government Administrative Law Court 94

SCOTUSBlog

JULY 21, 2022

Share The Supreme Court will again weigh the executive branch’s authority to set immigration policy as some red states claim that the Biden administration’s enforcement decisions are too lax. immigration policy generally, describing a “corrosive disrespect” by DHS for the rule of law and characterizing the U.S.-Mexico

Immigration 145

Immigration Court Government Court Rules 145

SCOTUSBlog

DECEMBER 31, 2020

Innovation Law Lab , a challenge to the Trump administration’s “remain in Mexico” policy, which allows the Department of Homeland Security to return immigrants seeking asylum to Mexico while they wait for an asylum hearing in U.S. immigration courts. Alcaraz-Enriquez (Feb. California (Feb. Saul & Davis v. Saul (Mar.

Calendaring 138

Calendaring Immigration Misdemeanor Construction 138

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

OCTOBER 19, 2023

The Scramble to Identify Major Questions in Administrative Law In its June 2022 decision in West Virginia v. The challenge of meeting changing conditions in administrative law is known as the pacing problem: scientific and technological developments will nearly always outstrip the pace of government oversight. Env’t Prot.

Statute 76

Statute Court Government Administrative Law 76

SCOTUSBlog

MAY 20, 2021

Millhiser illustrates this thesis with a whirlwind tour of four key areas: the right to vote, administrative law, religion and the right to sue. Even so, I am skeptical that the court will alter the law as dramatically as Millhiser fears. “The Carolene Products settlement in favor of democracy is now in tatters,” he writes.

Administrative Law 141

Administrative Law Court Immigration Laws 141

SCOTUSBlog

FEBRUARY 23, 2022

Share The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Wednesday in a case involving whether a group of states can defend a contentious Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule after the Biden administration refused to do so. alleging that the repeal of the law violated federal administrative law.

Immigration 94

Immigration Court Administrative Law Government 94