article thumbnail

December 2020 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The Washington Court of Appeals affirmed a guilty verdict against a climate activist who cut a chain to enter a pipeline facility and attempted to cut a bolt that secured a shutoff valve on the pipeline, which carried tar sands oil from Canada. The Court also accepted interventions by NGOs and other interested cities.

Court 54
article thumbnail

January 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The plaintiffs alleged that the pipeline project would almost double the pipeline’s capacity and that the project would facilitate increased extraction and use of Canadian tar sands oil, resulting in “significant damage, estimated in the hundreds of billions of dollars, due to its contribution climate change.” Bureau of Land Management , No.

Court 52
article thumbnail

November 2017 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The defendants—two of whom acknowledged they had attempted to shut down tar sands crude oil pipelines by turning shut-off valves on the pipelines—were charged with criminal damage to property of critical public facilities, utilities, and pipelines; trespass on such facilities; and/or aiding and abetting criminal damage to property and/or trespass.

Court 40