How Appealing



Friday, January 29, 2021

“Unlike Trump, Biden cannot lean on conservative Supreme Court to keep agenda alive”: Andrew Chung and Jarrett Renshaw of Reuters have this report.

Posted at 10:18 PM by Howard Bashman



“Pro-Trump attorney Lin Wood refuses Bar’s order to undergo psychiatric exam”: Alan Judd and Brad Schrade of The Atlanta Journal-Constitution have an article that begins, “Atlanta attorney L. Lin Wood, one of the most prominent purveyors of conspiracy theories surrounding the 2020 presidential election, is in danger of losing his ability to practice law in Georgia.”

Posted at 10:08 PM by Howard Bashman



“The Constitution Can Crack Section 230: Tech companies think the statute allows them to censor with impunity; The law is seldom so simple.” Law professor Philip Hamburger will have this op-ed in Saturday’s edition of The Wall Street Journal.

Posted at 8:50 PM by Howard Bashman



“Trump Supreme Court Twitter Spat Highlights ‘Doctrinal Puzzle'”: Kimberly Strawbridge Robinson of Bloomberg Law has this report.

Posted at 4:36 PM by Howard Bashman



“Oklahoma City asks Supreme Court to review 2015 panhandling ordinance”: William Crum of The Oklahoman has an article that begins, “A controversial Oklahoma City panhandling ordinance thrown out by a Denver court would have ‘withstood constitutional scrutiny’ in other parts of the country, attorneys for the city said Wednesday in a plea to the U.S. Supreme Court.”

Posted at 2:04 PM by Howard Bashman



“Trump Impeachment Lawyer Removed A Black Juror He Said ‘Shucked And Jived’; The South Carolina Supreme Court called attorney Greg Harris’ use of a racial stereotype ‘troublesome'”: Ryan J. Reilly of HuffPost has this report.

Posted at 2:00 PM by Howard Bashman