Remove sections
article thumbnail

Uganda Constitutional Court declares controversial section of communications law void

JURIST

The Ugandan Constitutional Court Tuesday declared a section of the Computer Misuse Act , No. Section 25 of the act prohibited any person from “willfully and repeatedly [using] electronic communication to disturb or attempt to disturb the peace, quiet or right of privacy of any person with no purpose of legitimate communication.”

Laws 274
article thumbnail

“A Partially Annotated Version of SCOTUS’s Section 3 Case”

HowAppealing

“A Partially Annotated Version of SCOTUS’s Section 3 Case”: Eric Segall has this blog post at ‘Dorf on Law.” ” The post “A Partially Annotated Version of SCOTUS’s Section 3 Case” appeared first on How Appealing.

Laws 100
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

“Supreme Betrayal: A requiem for Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment.”

HowAppealing

“Supreme Betrayal: A requiem for Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment.” The post “Supreme Betrayal: A requiem for Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment.” Michael Luttig and Laurence H. Tribe have this essay online at The Atlantic. ” appeared first on How Appealing.

100
100
article thumbnail

“Political questions and Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment”

HowAppealing

“Political questions and Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment”: Derek Muller has this post at the “Election Law Blog.” ” The post “Political questions and Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment” appeared first on How Appealing.

Laws 100
article thumbnail

“Griswold v. Anderson: The Section 3 Case Before The Colorado Supreme Court.”

HowAppealing

Anderson : The Section 3 Case Before The Colorado Supreme Court.” Anderson: The Section 3 Case Before The Colorado Supreme Court.” “ Griswold v. ” Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman have this post at “The Volokh Conspiracy.” ” The post “Griswold v.

Court 100
article thumbnail

“Old Constitutional Provisions and Presidential Selection: The folly of exhuming Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.”

HowAppealing

“Old Constitutional Provisions and Presidential Selection: The folly of exhuming Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.” ” The post “Old Constitutional Provisions and Presidential Selection: The folly of exhuming Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.” ” appeared first on How Appealing.

100
100
article thumbnail

Why Corporate DEI Challenges Increasingly Cite Section 1981

Law 360

Supreme Court's ruling on race-conscious college admissions last year, Section 1981 of the Civil Rights Act is supplanting Title VII as conservative activist groups' weapon of choice, say Mike Delikat and Tierra Piens at Orrick. As legal challenges to corporate diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives increase in the wake of the U.S.