This site uses cookies to improve your experience. By viewing our content, you are accepting the use of cookies. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country we will assume you are from the United States. View our privacy policy and terms of use.

Remove North Dakota Remove Punitive Damages Remove Statute Related Topics
Technology Assisted Review Compensatory Damages Depose Tort Immigration Court Rules Contract Litigating Litigation Court More Related Topics >
article thumbnail

Free exercise, greenhouse-gas regulation, and a slew of other relists from the long conference

SCOTUSBlog

OCTOBER 5, 2021

involving whether punitive damages that are twice compensatory damages, and fall within a state’s statutory punitive damages cap, are constitutionally excessive. North Dakota v. Three cases involving lawsuits over allegations that police officers used excessive force. Epic Systems Corp v.

Punitive Damages 54
Punitive Damages Compensatory Damages Court Statute 54
article thumbnail

November 2017 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

NOVEMBER 7, 2017

The court also granted motions to strike the state law claims pursuant to California’s anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation) statute. The court in the North Dakota case had denied the defendants’ request to present a necessity defense. Resolute Forest Products, Inc. Greenpeace International , No.

Court 40
Court Attorney Technology Assisted Review Legal 40
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

 

Stay Connected

Join 105,000+ Insiders by signing up for our newsletter

About
Awards
About
Editions
Awards
Editions
Topics
LinkedIn Twitter
Powered by Aggregage | Terms and Conditions | Your California Rights and Privacy Policy
© Aggregage 2024