Remove Court Remove Mississippi Remove Statute Remove Tort
article thumbnail

No civil liability for sharing truthful information about matter of public concern.

Day on Torts

In the context of countering plaintiffs’ assertion that the death was a homicide, defendant shared autopsy photographs of the son as well as some of his text messages, both of which were public records released by the Mississippi Attorney General’s Office. On appeal, this ruling was affirmed. Summary judgment was therefore affirmed.

Tort 59
article thumbnail

Petitions of the week: Four petitions that test the limits on lawsuits against the government

SCOTUSBlog

This week we highlight cert petitions that ask the Supreme Court to consider cases and statutes about suing various government entities, ranging from two counties to a state governor to the United States itself. The district court ruled that Ex parte Young applied because Congress’ approval of the compact made it binding federal law.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Justices turn down cadet’s attempt to sue government over sexual assault

SCOTUSBlog

Share The Supreme Court won’t weigh in on whether a West Point cadet who was sexually assaulted by a fellow classmate can sue the federal government. Lower courts struck down the law, and the state has asked the justices to take the case and reinstate it. The justices asked the federal government to provide its views in two cases.

article thumbnail

Mopping up final business with 14 new relists

SCOTUSBlog

Share The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. Because the court was running a little behind this year and just released its last opinions on Thursday, the court also held the mop-up conference on Thursday, and the order list will be released Friday morning at 9:30 a.m.

article thumbnail

February 2020 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

In a split decision, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that young people and other plaintiffs asserting a claim against the federal government for infringement of a Fifth Amendment due process right to a “ climate system capable of sustaining human life” did not have Article III standing. One reason the petitioners asked the D.C.