ABA Journal
JANUARY 13, 2022
A federal appeals court ruled Tuesday that Rhode Island students can’t proceed with their lawsuit contending that the state failed to provide an adequate civics…
JonathanTurley
JANUARY 17, 2024
In 1984, the Supreme Court ruled in Chevron U.S.A. We should acknowledge forthrightly that Chevron did not undo, and could not have undone, the judicial duty to provide an independent judgment of the law’s meaning in the cases that come before the Nation’s courts.” The cases are Loper Bright Enterprises v.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
The Crime Report
APRIL 26, 2021
The Supreme Court agreed on Monday to hear an appeal to expand gun rights in the United States in a New York case over the right to carry a firearm in public for self-defense, marking the court’s first foray into gun rights since Justice Amy Coney Barrett came on board in October, making a 6-3 conservative majority, reports the Chicago Tribune.
Parasec
APRIL 4, 2024
Federal: Federal Court Rules CTA Unconstitutional On March 1, 2024, a federal court in Alabama ruled in National Small Business United (NSBU) v. Yellen that the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) exceeds Congress’s constitutional power. To read more on Senate Bill 8059, please go here.
JonathanTurley
MARCH 23, 2024
University of Rhode Island professor Erik Loomis defended the murder of a conservative protester and said he saw “nothing wrong” with such acts of violence. It has lost major court rulings due to its unconstitutional treatment of conservative speakers.
JonathanTurley
JUNE 20, 2022
Ohio , the Supreme Court ruled in 1969 that even calling for violence is protected under the First Amendment unless there is a threat of “ imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action.”. That is legitimately concerning and chilling language. In Brandenburg v.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
SEPTEMBER 10, 2021
Under the Endangered Species Act, the court vacated the FWS’s biological opinion because the incidental take statement lacked “the requisite specificity of mitigation measures for the polar bear” and because the take finding for the polar bear was arbitrary and capricious. Rhode Island v. West Virginia v. 19-1818 (1st Cir.).
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
80 
Let's personalize your content