Remove Court Rules Remove Felony Remove Immigration Remove Texas
article thumbnail

US Supreme Court rules states lack constitutional standing in key immigration case

JURIST

The US Supreme Court ruled Friday in US v. The crux of the case rests on Article III of the US Constitution, which governs the Court’s judicial purview. The US District Court Southern District of Texas ruled in favor of the states, enjoining Homeland Security from enforcing the memorandum.

article thumbnail

Texas governor asserts state right to self-defense in response to escalating southern border tensions

JURIST

Texas Governor Greg Abbott issued a statement asserting Texas’ constitutional right to self-defense on Wednesday as tensions with the Biden administration over security along the US southern border escalated. “ President Biden has instructed his agencies to ignore federal statutes that mandate the detention of illegal immigrants.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Do We Need the Polygraph to Protect Our Borders?

The Crime Report

My circle of family and friends comprises veteran immigration agents and persons with significant law enforcement experience. From a legal perspective, since the 1930s , the courts have found polygraphs to be invalid for usage in prosecutions and legal cases. I was confident of being accepted. In 1998, however, the U.S.

article thumbnail

March 2018 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

The federal district court for the Southern District of California rejected challenges to waivers of environmental laws granted by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for certain types of border wall construction projects in San Diego County. The two states said the circumstances providing a basis for the stay (i.e.,

Court 40