Remove Court Decisions Remove Government Remove Laws Remove Statute
article thumbnail

Nevada Supreme Court upholds state ban on ghost guns, reversing lower-court decision

JURIST

The Nevada Supreme Court upheld a 2021 state ban on ghost guns Thursday, overturning a lower-court decision that declared the law unconstitutional for being vague. Stiglich authored the opinion of the court. Because the law requires a general intent, Stiglich found no risk of arbitrary enforcement.

article thumbnail

Alberta legislature introduces bill which would allow provincial governments to override federal law

JURIST

Called the Alberta Sovereignty within a United Canada Act , the proposed legislation empowers the provincial cabinet to dismiss federal laws, programs, and policies. The current Albertan government has been a regular and vocal critic of the federal government’s emission reduction targets.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

US appeals court holds employers can discriminate against employees who obtain abortions

JURIST

The case arose over a 2019 New York law that prohibits an employer from “discriminat[ing] nor tak[ing] any retaliatory personnel action against an employee with respect to compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment because of or on the basis of the employee’s or dependent’s reproductive health decision making.”

Statute 267
article thumbnail

SCOTUS Narrows Reach of Identity Fraud Statute

Constitutional Law Reporter

Supreme Court narrowed the scope of a federal aggravated identity theft statute. Section 1028A(a)(1) applies when a defendant, “during and in relation to any [predicate offense, such as healthcare fraud], knowingly transfers, possesses, or uses, without lawful authority, a means of identification of another person.” In Durbin v.

Statute 52
article thumbnail

Former candidates say New Jersey’s “slogan statutes” violate the First Amendment

SCOTUSBlog

Laws governing elections and the right to participate in the political process receive varying degrees of scrutiny when challenged in court. The Supreme Court has held that election laws restricting “core political speech” trigger a high degree of suspicion under the First Amendment. Bond , Rivas-Villegas v.

Statute 86
article thumbnail

Supreme Court Decision Could Undermine LGBTQ Rights

The Crime Report

The Supreme Court’s decision in Marietta Memorial Hospital v DaVita could enable anti-LGBTQ discrimination by both government entities and private businesses, Vox reports.

article thumbnail

D.C. Circuit Sides with Manufacturers in Latest 340B Contract Pharmacy Case

FDA Law Blog

Carole Johnson (consolidated cases), the Court found that the conditions set by Novartis and United Therapeutics on covered entities did not violate the 340B statute, although more restrictive conditions could violate the law. District Court and won, prompting a government appeal to the D.C.