Remove Court Decisions Remove Drafting Remove Litigating Remove Statute
article thumbnail

“Supreme Court Allows Challenge to Texas Abortion Law but Leaves It in Effect; The law, which bans most abortions after about six weeks of pregnancy, was drafted to evade review in federal court and has been in effect since September”

HowAppealing

“Supreme Court Allows Challenge to Texas Abortion Law but Leaves It in Effect; The law, which bans most abortions after about six weeks of pregnancy, was drafted to evade review in federal court and has been in effect since September”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report. ” David G. .”

Drafting 100
article thumbnail

Supreme Court Lowers the Bar for Title VII Suits Alleging Discriminatory Transfers

Constitutional Law Reporter

There is nothing in the provision to distinguish, as the courts below did, between transfers causing significant disadvantages and transfers causing not-so-significant ones. To demand “significance” is to add words—and significant words, as it were—to the statute Congress enacted.

Court 52
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Why File a Protective Claim for Refund for Cannabis?

Hoban Law Group

Recent developments have made it even more attractive — for example, the basis for the argument of unconstitutionality of §280E has recently and ably been outlined by the judiciary in three dissenting opinions to a 2019 Tax Court decision (For a summary, see: [link] ).

Drafting 105
article thumbnail

The Kenyan Supreme Court holds that Scottish Locus Inspection Orders must be Examined by the Kenyan Courts for Recognition and Enforcement in Kenya

Conflict of Laws

We would also like to thank Professor Beligh Elbalti for his critical comments on the draft blogpost. ’ This Case is highly significant, because it extensively addresses the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in Kenya and the principles to be considered by the Kenyan Courts.

Court 68
article thumbnail

Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question

SCOTUSBlog

The meaning of these distinctions is at the core of the current litigation over the 2020 CARES Act. They further claim that subsequent statutes, federal agencies and appeals court decisions have all already recognized the corporations as entities eligible for federal contracting under the ISDA.

article thumbnail

Private rights of action, overtime pay, and the constitutionality of a billboard tax

SCOTUSBlog

Animal Legal Defense Fund , involving the constitutionality of a Kansas statute criminalizing trespass by deception at animal facilities with intent to damage the enterprise. McCall , the other case raising the issue, which the court will now hold pending the outcome of Mallory. Next up is Bartenwerfer v.

Statute 75
article thumbnail

Final Update: Repository HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention

Conflict of Laws

A Critical Overview of the Hague Preliminary Draft on Judgments”, Yearbook of Private International Law 17 (2015/2016), pp 1-31 Bonomi, Andrea; Mariottini, Cristina M. Breaking) News From The Hague: A Game Changer in International Litigation? 11 of August 2000 (available here ), pp 19-128 II. “A 2019-02, pp 1-35 Brand, Ronald A.