SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 20, 2022

Some older Supreme Court decisions support that theory of consent. Some courts read [Supreme Court precedent] as effectively foreclosing [this consent-by-registration theory of jurisdiction], while others insist it remains viable.”.

Statute 104

Statute Stare Decisis Court Manufacturing 104

HowAppealing

DECEMBER 10, 2021

David Goodman and Ruth Graham of The New York Times report that “ Small Court Victories Change Nothing for Women Seeking Abortions in Texas; A Texas statute that bans abortion after six weeks of pregnancy was seemingly undercut by two court rulings, but the reality on the ground has not changed.” ” David G. .”

Drafting 100

Drafting Laws Court Court Rules 100

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

DECEMBER 11, 2020

Federal Court in Washington Upheld Forest Restoration Plan. The federal district court for the Eastern District of Washington upheld the U.S. The federal district court for the Western District of Washington vacated U.S. Hawaii Court Ruled that Commercial Aquarium Fishing Required Environmental Review.

Court 55

Court Government Litigation Litigating 55

JonathanTurley

MAY 25, 2021

In addition, we have faced these controversies on campuses, including on the George Washington University campus. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit on Feb. 12 ruled that an Arkansas anti-BDS law violates the First Amendment. In a 2-1 panel decision, the court also found that the was overly broad.

Court Rules 39

Court Rules Contract Laws Court 39

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

JULY 6, 2017

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a West Virginia federal district court had erred in concluding that it had jurisdiction to consider the coal company Murray Energy Corporation’s and its affiliates’ lawsuit that sought to compel EPA to conduct evaluations of the Clean Air Act’s employment effects. A-3393-15T4 et al.

Court 40

Court Litigation Litigating Attorney 40

JonathanTurley

FEBRUARY 7, 2023

Lauren Handy and nine other anti-abortion activists were charged last year with conspiring to obstruct access to a Washington abortion clinic on Oct. They have asked for the dismissal of the indictment for lack of jurisdiction since the Court ruled in Dobbs that “the Constitution does not confer a right to abortion.”

Court 47

Court Laws Statute Contract 47

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 1, 2021

The justices once again did not act, however, on the petition for rehearing filed by Washington state florist Barronnelle Stutzman, who declined to make custom flower arrangements for a same-sex wedding because of her religious beliefs. Abortion coverage by employers.

Court 90

Court Government Court Rules Statute 90

SCOTUSBlog

FEBRUARY 14, 2024

Stephen Bright, The Washington Post) The post The morning read for Wednesday, Feb. It still happens all too often. 14 appeared first on SCOTUSblog.

Court Decisions 87

Court Decisions Court Rules Court 87

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 10, 2024

6 rioters win early release, even before key Supreme Court ruling (Spencer S. Hsu, The Washington Post) Utah, trade groups ask Supreme Court to review oil rail line (Niina H. Here’s the Wednesday morning read: Some Jan.

Court Decisions 72

Court Decisions Court Rules Court 72

HowAppealing

NOVEMBER 20, 2023

“Federal Court Moves to Drastically Weaken Voting Rights Act; The ruling, which is almost certain to be appealed to the Supreme Court, would effectively bar private citizens and civil rights groups from suing under a key provision of the landmark law”: Nick Corasaniti of The New York Times has this report.

Court 100

Court Court Rules Laws Court Decisions 100

The Crime Report

JANUARY 4, 2023

In his thesis, Harpster originally said this number was 1 in 5 and attributed the figure to an unpublished study by a now-dead detective and professor in Washington state. A detective in Washington state, Marty Garland, told Harpster that a young mother had called 911 in November 2018 after her infant stopped breathing in his sleep.

Attorney 98

Attorney Court Laws Education 98

SCOTUSBlog

DECEMBER 31, 2020

And I had their ear, explaining Supreme Court decisions on a regular basis over many years. In June, the court ruled in R.G. & Before becoming clerk of the Supreme Court, Stevas was the clerk of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals and worked as an assistant U.S. Harris Funder Homes v.

Court 119

Court Lawyer Lawyers Administrative Assistant 119

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

OCTOBER 7, 2019

Minnesota Supreme Court Declined to Review Claims Regarding Environmental Review for Oil Pipeline. The Minnesota Supreme Court denied petitions for further review of an appellate court decision finding all but one aspect of the environmental review for the Enbridge Line 3 oil pipeline project to be adequate.

Court 40

Court Government Statute Tort 40

HowAppealing

JUNE 24, 2021

“Biden Removes Chief of Housing Agency After Supreme Court Ruling; The case was brought by shareholders of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, who said the law that created the agency was unconstitutional”: Matthew Goldstein, Adam Liptak, and Jim Tankersley have this article in today’s edition of The New York Times.

Court Rules 100

Court Rules Court Court Decisions Laws 100

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

MARCH 6, 2018

DECISIONS AND SETTLEMENTS. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a district court decision that vacated the listing of the Arctic ringed seal as threatened under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The action involved closing valves on pipelines in Washington, Montana, Minnesota, and North Dakota.

Court 40

Court Government Laws Litigation 40

JonathanTurley

JULY 4, 2022

After major rulings on gun rights, abortion and climate change, Democratic leaders and pundits declared the court to be “illegitimate.” Madison in 1803, when the court ruled that it must be the final arbiter of what the law means. Some early Americans declared they would simply defy what the court ruled after Marbury.

Court Rules 45

Court Rules Court Laws Court Decisions 45

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

SEPTEMBER 10, 2021

Under the Endangered Species Act, the court vacated the FWS’s biological opinion because the incidental take statement lacked “the requisite specificity of mitigation measures for the polar bear” and because the take finding for the polar bear was arbitrary and capricious. Northern Plains Resource Council v. Army Corps of Engineers , No.

Litigation 40

Litigation Litigating Court Laws 40

JonathanTurley

NOVEMBER 12, 2021

But it also is a generally-worded statute that can be interpreted broadly, and I expect a split in court decisions — and that only increases the likelihood of a Supreme Court review. Ironically, the Supreme Court warned against such sudden agency “finds” of regulatory authority.

Court 41

Court Statute Small Business Lawyer 41

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

JUNE 8, 2021

Justice Sotomayor dissented, writing that she believed the Court’s interpretation would allow defendants to “sidestep” the general bar on appellate review by “shoehorning” a civil rights or federal officer removal argument into their case for removal. Washington , No. Justice Alito did not take part in the case. Connecticut v.

Court 42

Court Statute Government Litigation 42

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

AUGUST 4, 2021

Washington Supreme Court Said Climate Activist Was Entitled to Present Necessity Defense Based on Evidence that Legal Alternatives Were Not “Truly Reasonable”. State of Washington ex rel. Spokane County District Court , No. DECISIONS AND SETTLEMENTS. FEATURED CASE. Haskell v. 98719-0 (Wash. July 15, 2021).

Court 40

Court Litigation Litigating Government 40

SCOTUSBlog

FEBRUARY 2, 2024

27, the Michigan Supreme Court declined to review a lower-court decision that allowed Trump to appear on the state’s primary ballot. As in Minnesota, the lower court’s ruling does not foreclose a new challenge to Trump’s appearance on the general election ballot. In a ruling on Dec. And on Dec.

Court 145

Court Lawyer Lawyers Laws 145