SCOTUSBlog

MARCH 21, 2022

After the law went into effect over a veto by the state’s governor, Democrat Roy Cooper, the North Carolina NAACP went to federal court, arguing that the law violates both federal voting rights laws and the Constitution. In Berger v. Doesn’t that just make things more complicated?”.

Attorney 76

Attorney Litigation Litigating Laws 76

JonathanTurley

JULY 12, 2022

Indeed, last week my study on the decline of free speech was published with other example of this rising orthodoxy among faculty members (“ Harm and Hegemony: The Decline of Free Speech in the United States ”). It is not enough for Professor Feldman to passionately disagree with the constitutional interpretation of the Court or other faculty.

Lawyer 37

Lawyer Lawyers Laws Law School 37

JonathanTurley

MARCH 20, 2021

We recently discussed the case of University of North Carolina law student Sagar Sharma, a student of color, who faced a recall election as the first-year class co-president. Being a lawyer requires a certain level of decorum and professionalism within the institutional setting. There is no room for insults and anger.

Laws 33

Laws Law School Statute Construction 33

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 30, 2021

The Christian Legal Society and Robertson Center for Constitutional Law , Concerned Women for America , and Judicial Watch, Inc. The brief was filed by Jonathan Mitchell, the anti-abortion lawyer who designed Texas’ six-week abortion ban and argued before the court on Nov. 1 in support of that law.

Stare Decisis 134

Stare Decisis Court Laws Legal 134