Constitutional Law Law School Legal Ohio 
JonathanTurley
JULY 20, 2023
Today’s legal-political sequel, however, may prove to be a bit more controversial. 6 allegations are far more tenuous legally. Such an indictment could come at a high legal and political cost. That speech is entirely protected under the First Amendment and governing case law, including Brandenburg v. is obvious.
JonathanTurley
NOVEMBER 16, 2023
Ohio , 378 U.S. Jonathan Turley, an attorney, constitutional law scholar and legal analyst, is the Shapiro Chair for Public Interest Law at The George Washington University Law School. 184 (1964): “I shall not today attempt further to define [it] … But I know it when I see it.”
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
JonathanTurley
AUGUST 18, 2023
As I myself covered the indictment as a legal analyst for Fox, I once again felt a certain longing for the abandon shown by some of my counterparts who dismissed any concern over what are now roughly 100 criminal charges against former President Donald Trump in four different indictments. In January 2005, then-Sen. House Jan.
JonathanTurley
OCTOBER 12, 2023
I began my association with the House as a teenaged leadership page in the 1970s and continued through to my legal representation of the House in federal court. I have testified more than 100 times over the last four decades on a wide array of constitutional and statutory issues. and Jim Jordan (R-Ohio). Steve Scalise (R-La.)
JonathanTurley
APRIL 19, 2021
After the riot, various legal experts appeared on news channels to proclaim that this was a strong if not conclusive case for criminal incitement. CNN legal analyst Elie Honig declared “As a prosecutor I’d gladly show a jury Trump’s own inflammatory statements and argue they cross the line to criminality.” Trump’s Jan.
JonathanTurley
JUNE 17, 2022
There is also no compelling legal basis for the claim. You don’t have to go to law school to know that there’s something seriously criminal about that. You don’t have to go to law school to know that there’s something seriously criminal about that.” ” I guess there is no doubt. In Brandenburg v.
JonathanTurley
APRIL 2, 2022
Carter ruled that such legal advice failed under the “crime/fraud exception” because the president knew there was no basis for such a challenge. As legal experts celebrate Carter’s decision as a great victory against Trump, it is important to consider the implications for both free speech and attorney-client privilege.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
28 
Let's personalize your content