JonathanTurley

JULY 11, 2022

It is not only legally and medically false but it is dangerous if women actually believe what they are hearing or reading from these figures. Here is the column: After the Court’s decision in Dobbs v. .” It is a great talking point but it just happens to be untrue as both a legal and medical matter.

Legal 59

Legal Legal Laws Court 59

JonathanTurley

SEPTEMBER 22, 2023

Recently, a court found that the Biden Administration’s censorship efforts constituted “ the most massive attack against free speech in United States history. criticized me for offering “legal opinions” without working at Twitter. Those words by Chief U.S. District Judge Terry A. In the first censorship hearing, Rep.

Government 57

Government Immigration Laws Constitutional Law 57

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 30, 2021

Numerous groups attack the viability standard that the court adopted in Roe v. Three physicians and the Catholic Association Foundation write that advances in science have “painted an intimate portrait of the fetus and its humanity” and therefore the court’s viability framework is outdated. Wade and Planned Parenthood v.

Stare Decisis 134

Stare Decisis Court Laws Legal 134

JonathanTurley

JULY 15, 2022

The President and the Court appear in agreement. Here is the column: “Consider the challenge accepted, Court.” ” Ironically, it was the only part of the president’s remarks that is consistent with what the court actually said in its decision in Dobbs v. .” Jackson Women’s Health Organization.

Court 35

Court Laws Court Rules Legal 35

JonathanTurley

OCTOBER 23, 2022

There is an interesting development out of a case in Louisiana where a federal judge has ruled that Dr. Anthony Fauci and White House officials must testify in a case alleging a backchannel for censorship on social media. The lawsuit filed by Missouri and Louisiana was joined by experts, including Drs. The complaint in Schmitt v.

Government 37

Government Litigation Litigating Constitutional Law 37

JonathanTurley

JANUARY 6, 2021

Here is the column: It is a touchstone of American constitutional law that nothing protects your right to shout “fire!” Moreover, it also distracts us from critical constitutional issues. It is also important to note that the electoral votes of a given state can be challenged in the courts, as they were after the 2020 election.

Constitutional Law 36

Constitutional Law Laws Drafting Court 36

SCOTUSBlog

APRIL 13, 2022

During his time as an associate justice from 1877 to 1911, he broke with his colleagues in some of the most consequential – and infamous – rulings that the court has ever issued. In the end, though, a large part of the story turned on the question of just what it was that enabled Harlan to see the law so differently from his peers.

Court 118

Court Education Government Legal 118

JonathanTurley

NOVEMBER 29, 2021

Jackson Women’s Health Organization , the Court’s most watched case this term on abortion rights. The oral argument is scheduled for December 1st, the same week that the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit will hear an expedited appeal over the even more stringent Texas abortion law.

Stare Decisis 37

Stare Decisis Court Laws Law School 37

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

AUGUST 4, 2021

Washington Supreme Court Said Climate Activist Was Entitled to Present Necessity Defense Based on Evidence that Legal Alternatives Were Not “Truly Reasonable”. The Supreme Court reversed an intermediate appellate court’s decision affirming a superior court determination that the defendant could not present a necessity defense.

Court 40

Court Litigation Litigating Government 40

JonathanTurley

APRIL 18, 2022

When I was clerking in Louisiana after graduating law school, there was story of a rather notorious local judge asking counsel in a criminal case if he was ready to present the case of the defendant. Jennifer Granholm (D-Mich) in 2007 after a long legal career as private counsel. Gleicher was appointed by Gov.

Attorney 37

Attorney Laws Law School Law Firm 37

JonathanTurley

JANUARY 17, 2021

On its face, the planned impeachment trial is at odds with the language of the Constitution, which expressly states that removal of a president is the primary purpose of such a trial. He will be a citizen and would be best served legally to forgo the trial entirely as extraconstitutional and invalid.

Misdemeanor 35

Misdemeanor Constitutional Law Court Legal 35

JonathanTurley

JANUARY 18, 2021

It was a reckless speech — but, in a court of law, it would constitute protected speech. William Blount of Tennessee faced allegations of conspiring to help Great Britain seize what is now Louisiana. Courts have long maintained that impeachments are left to Congress. Yet this is different.

Laws 44

Laws Constitutional Law Court Legal 44

JonathanTurley

NOVEMBER 23, 2020

With the adverse ruling in Pennsylvania, the Trump legal team is still pledging new evidence of massive fraud as certifications are completed. The options for the team seem more and more reduced to the ultimate constitutional trick shot in engineering a fight on the floor of Congress. In Bush v. 8 or beyond Dec.

Litigation 44

Litigation Litigating Legal Legal 44