Constitutional Law Reporter

DECEMBER 19, 2022

Supreme Court heard oral arguments in four cases. United States , which involves the scope of a key federal bribery law. Below is a brief summary of the other cases before the Court: Ciminelli v. The justices have agreed to clarify the states’ ability to challenge federal immigration policy, among other issues.

Court 52

Court Laws Statute Immigration 52

JURIST

NOVEMBER 2, 2023

This comes as Pakistan Interim Interior Minister Sarfraz Bugti issued a warning last week to “illegal immigrants” living in Pakistan to voluntarily leave the country by November 1 or risk potential arrest and deportation. ” UN human rights experts Tuesday called upon Pakistan to not carry out its planned deportations.

Immigration 169

Immigration Constitutional Law Government Court 169

Constitutional Law Reporter

DECEMBER 16, 2022

Supreme Court recently agreed to consider a case that is expected to define the scope of federal identity theft law. The specific issue before the Court in Dubin v. After a district court upheld the convictions, Dubin appealed. Issues Before the Supreme Court. Facts of the Case.

Healthcare 52

Healthcare Court Felony Statute 52

Constitutional Law Reporter

MARCH 1, 2021

Supreme Court heard oral arguments in three cases last week. California , which involves whether police pursuits for misdemeanors justify a warrantless entry, an issue which has divided the lower courts. The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in two other cases. ” The most-closely watched case is Lange v.

Misdemeanor 52

Misdemeanor Court Immigration Constitutional Law 52

Constitutional Law Reporter

JULY 26, 2021

Supreme Court held that the detention of noncitizens ordered removed from the United States who reenter without authorization is governed by 8 U.S.C. Federal immigration law establishes procedures for removing aliens living unlawfully in the United States as well as for determining whether such persons are detained during removal proceedings.

Court 52

Court Immigration Government Constitutional Law 52

JonathanTurley

MARCH 28, 2024

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has blocked border enforcement by the state under Texas’s SB 4. Many of us had predicted this result given the prior precedent of the Supreme Court on the federal preemption of state immigration laws. United States , 567 U.S. Instead, in The Federalist No.

Immigration 46

Immigration Government Laws Court 46

Constitutional Law Reporter

JANUARY 25, 2024

Supreme Court returned from recess on January 4, 2024. The Court’s January session will feature some of the Term’s biggest cases, with several testing the limit of the federal government’s regulatory power. Below is a brief summary of the issues before the Court: Federal Bureau of Investigation v. Campos-Chaves v. In Siegel v.

Immigration 52

Immigration Government Court Manufacturing 52

Constitutional Law Reporter

JANUARY 31, 2022

The central issue before the Court in both cases is whether the vaccine mandates should be allowed to move forward while the legal challenges work their way through the lower courts. This past week, the Court heard oral arguments in four cases. Below is a brief summary of the issues before the Court: Gallardo v.

Immigration 52

Immigration Statute Tort Healthcare 52

Above The Law

DECEMBER 28, 2022

The majority of the Supreme Court is once again shifting their interpretation of the law in order to support right-wing political objectives! More law schools are kicking USNWR rankings to the curb. We're now at 10 percent of law schools that say they will not participate in the ranking process. Huffington Post ].

Law School 78

Law School Finance Constitutional Law Court Decisions 78

JonathanTurley

JUNE 1, 2021

Photograph by Fred Schilling, Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States. Today the Supreme Court issued two more unanimous decisions in Garland v. The weekly display of unanimity is notable given the calls by Democratic leaders to pack the Court. Recently, Breyer warned against any move to expand the Supreme Court.

Court 59

Court Immigration Court Rules Government 59

SCOTUSBlog

JULY 28, 2022

Share When the Supreme Court ended the constitutional right to abortion in Dobbs v. The Dobbs majority opinion was the third-longest Supreme Court opinion since the beginning of the 1946-47 term, according to our analysis. Both trends could further diminish perceptions of a collegial and productive court.

Drafting 95

Drafting Court Immigration Construction 95

Constitutional Law Reporter

MARCH 10, 2022

Supreme Court recently returned to the bench for its February sitting. The issues before the Court involved Native American law and immigration. Below is a brief summary of the cases before the Court: Denezpi v. Under the Immigration and Nationality Act ( 8 U.S.C. Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v.

Immigration 52

Immigration Constitutional Law Drafting Court 52

JonathanTurley

SEPTEMBER 5, 2023

Phil Murphy is pushing back on a plan to fly undocumented immigrants to his state, suggesting that New Jersey is now effectively off-limits to planned federal flights dropping off undocumented immigrants. However, these federal flights can only be blocked under federal law. New Jersey’s Democrat Gov.

Immigration 45

Immigration Legal Legal Laws 45

Constitutional Law Reporter

JUNE 17, 2022

Supreme Court held that the authority of a court to imply a cause of action under Bivens v. While the Court did not overrule Bivens , it did emphasize that recognizing a Bivens cause of action is “a disfavored judicial activity.”. The District Court declined to extend Bivens as re- quested, but the Court of Appeals reversed.

Cause of Action 52

Cause of Action Court Tort Immigration 52

Constitutional Law Reporter

JANUARY 30, 2023

Supreme Court has failed to discover who leaked a draft of the Court’s opinion in Dobbs v. According to the Court’s investigatory report, the Court “has to date been unable to identify a person responsible by a preponderance of the evidence.” Below is a brief summary of the issues before the Court: Perez v.

Drafting 52

Drafting Immigration Work From Home Court 52

JonathanTurley

DECEMBER 2, 2020

This afternoon I have the pleasure of joining a distinguished panel to speak on the Supreme Court at the University of Southern California’s Gould School of Law. The event is part of the LACBA Business Law Section 2020 Virtual Institute for Corporate Counsel and will also include Michael J.

Law School 32

Law School Laws Court Immigration 32

JonathanTurley

DECEMBER 27, 2022

This evening, the Supreme Court issued an order in the Title 42 case that stayed the nationwide vacatur issue by Emmet G. The Court ordered that. It is not clear what the Court meant by “does not prevent the federal government from taking any action with respect to that policy.” Circuit upheld the order.

Court 37

Court Immigration Government Calendaring 37

SCOTUSBlog

JULY 29, 2022

Share The Petitions of the Week column highlights a selection of cert petitions recently filed in the Supreme Court. Under longstanding constitutional law, most laws survive constitutional challenges so long as the government has a “rational basis” for enacting them. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit affirmed.

Manufacturing 102

Manufacturing Immigration Constitutional Law Court 102

JonathanTurley

JUNE 21, 2021

Below is my column in the Hill on the growing number of losses by the Biden Administration in courts around the country, including a particularly embarrassing loss before the United States Supreme Court. The Supreme Court later upheld the core elements of the travel ban and rejected the general claims raised against it.)

Court 47

Court Immigration Statute Laws 47

JonathanTurley

JULY 9, 2022

Below is my column in the Hill on the effort to declare an “invasion” along the Texas border to allow the state to take greater control along the border to stem the flow of illegal immigrants. Greg Abbott signed an order allowing Texas law enforcement to return illegal immigrants apprehended in the state back to the U.S.

Immigration 33

Immigration Government Court Laws 33

JonathanTurley

JUNE 29, 2023

After months of dire predictions of a coup in the making, the Court overwhelmingly rejected the underlying “independent state legislature,” as some of us predicted. Harper, in which North Carolina legislators argued that state courts could not override state legislatures on federal election districts.

Court 36

Court Immigration Law School Laws 36

JonathanTurley

DECEMBER 17, 2021

Below is my column in The Hill on the recent bills proposed in Florida and California on immigration and guns. In California, Newsom pledged to re-purpose the Texas “heartbeat law” to limit gun rights. Newsom’s gun ‘heartbeat’ law. If written as Newsom described, the law would be dead-on-arrival.

Immigration 33

Immigration Laws Court Sports 33

JonathanTurley

OCTOBER 6, 2022

Now the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has upheld a lower court in ruling against DACA. The court declared: “Under the first factor, DACA’s deficiencies are severe. The district court’s excellent opinion correctly identified fundamental substantive defects in the program. United States.

Court Rules 43

Court Rules Court Immigration Government 43

Constitutional Law Reporter

JANUARY 19, 2023

Supreme Court agreed to keep the federal government’s Title 42 policy in place while legal challenges continue. By a vote of 5-4, the justices stayed a lower court decision that would have lifted the policy on December 21, 2022. Circuit Court of Appeals denied the States’ motion. In Arizona et al. Alejandro Mayorkas et al.,

Court Decisions 59

Court Decisions Court Constitutional Law Government 59

JonathanTurley

JUNE 9, 2023

First, let’s look at the law. The California provision states that kidnapping involves someone who “abducts or takes by force or fraud any person contrary to the law of the place where that act is committed, and brings, sends, or conveys that person within the limits of this state.”

Laws 37

Laws Misdemeanor Attorney Felony 37

Constitutional Law Reporter

MAY 17, 2022

Supreme Court has concluded its oral arguments for the October 2021 Term. Below is a brief summary of the cases before the Court: Nance v. Below is a brief summary of the cases before the Court: Nance v. On remand, the lower courts found that Kennedy lost his job solely because of his religious expression. In Bucklew v.

Immigration 52

Immigration Court Constitutional Law Legal 52

JonathanTurley

JANUARY 6, 2024

Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada yanked the citizenship application after learning of the conviction under Putin’s draconian laws. Not only did she write the blogs while living in Canada, she notified Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada about the charges and supplied the underlying papers to the government.

Government 48

Government Immigration Legal Legal 48

SCOTUSBlog

MAY 20, 2021

Share A review of Ian Millhiser, The Agenda: How a Republican Supreme Court Is Reshaping America (Columbia Global Reports 2021). Millhiser begins the book by highlighting the Supreme Court’s present-day power and sketching the historical evolution that brought it to this point. Columbia Global Reports 2021).

Administrative Law 138

Administrative Law Court Immigration Laws 138

JonathanTurley

AUGUST 27, 2021

The Biden Administration has racked up a long line of losses in federal courts in what is one of the worst records in the first six months of any modern presidency. This week the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to strike down President Biden’s renewal of the controversial eviction moratorium. The latest is one of the most disturbing.

Court 47

Court Legal Legal Court Rules 47

JonathanTurley

NOVEMBER 25, 2023

It is not clear how other factors may have affected this increase from increased immigration across the Southern border to changing economic conditions. In a related story,Carson City District Court Judge James Russell has ruled against putting a constitutional amendment on the ballot for 2024 to make abortion a constitutional right.

Immigration 43

Immigration Court Constitutional Law Laws 43

Constitutional Law Reporter

JANUARY 3, 2022

Supreme Court ended its December sitting with oral arguments in Carson v. Constitution. 2246 (2020), the Supreme Court held that a state may not exclude families and schools from participating in a student-aid program because of a school’s religious status. The issue is now before the Court in Carson v.

Diligence 52

Diligence Court Immigration Constitutional Law 52

JonathanTurley

JANUARY 10, 2024

Despite decades of controversial cabinet members accused of flaunting the law or abusing their positions, Congress has only crossed this Rubicon once. Such releases, however, occurred in prior administrations and the merits of these claims are still being argued in court. That was Secretary of War William Belknap in 1876.

Misdemeanor 40

Misdemeanor Immigration Tort Laws 40

JonathanTurley

NOVEMBER 13, 2021

Not only is the use of OSHA regulations unprecedented for imposing a national vaccine mandate, I noted that Chief of Staff Ron Klain went to Twitter to herald the use of OSHA as a “work around” the constitutional limitations placed on President Biden. I asked how a court would respond to such an admission.

Litigation 81

Litigation Litigating Court Immigration 81

JonathanTurley

AUGUST 15, 2021

Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas delivered a blow to the Biden Administration on Friday by ordering the reinstatement of the Trump-era Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP) program, also known as the “Remain-in-Mexico” policy. ” That should sound familiar.

Court 76

Court Immigration Court Rules Litigation 76

JonathanTurley

JULY 3, 2023

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez bizarrely condemned the Supreme Court for usurping congressional authority by supporting congressional authority in the student loan case. She renewed her calls for retaliation through subpoenas, court packing, and even impeachment. She previously said that she did not understand why we needed a Supreme Court.

Education 49

Education Immigration Court Laws 49

JonathanTurley

SEPTEMBER 22, 2022

Indeed, I teach in torts where an immigrant to the United States filed a tort action for an involuntary inoculation upon entry in O’Brien v. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), including USCIS Form AR-11, “Alien’s Change of Address Card.” The complaint is stronger on rhetoric than supporting facts or law.

Tort 44

Tort Immigration Litigation Litigating 44

JonathanTurley

SEPTEMBER 10, 2021

In the law, it is called an admission against interest or an out-of-court statement by a party that, when uttered, is against the party’s pecuniary, proprietary, or penal interests. The problem is that the thing being “worked around” is the Constitution. In politics, it is called just dumb.

Litigation 56

Litigation Litigating Immigration Legal 56