Constitutional Law Court Court Rules Texas 
Constitutional Law Reporter
JULY 12, 2023
Texas , 599 U.S. _ (2023), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Texas and Louisiana lacked standing to challenge a Biden Administration immigration enforcement policy. On the merits, the District Court found the Guidelines unlawful and vacated them. In United States v. 1231(a)(2) ).
Constitutional Law Reporter
JUNE 16, 2021
Supreme Court held that a district court does not have the discretion to deny or reduce the costs awarded by an appellate court under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 39. On appeal, the Court of Appeals determined that the OTCs had not underpaid on their taxes. Supreme Court’s Decision. Hotels.com, L.P.,
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
JonathanTurley
OCTOBER 6, 2022
Now the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has upheld a lower court in ruling against DACA. The court declared: “Under the first factor, DACA’s deficiencies are severe. The district court’s excellent opinion correctly identified fundamental substantive defects in the program.
JonathanTurley
FEBRUARY 5, 2024
Below is my column in The Hill on the worsening situation at the Southern border and how the Supreme Court laid the seeds for this crisis over a decade ago. The courts have left few options for either the states or Congress in compelling the enforcement of federal law. No state faces a greater danger than Texas.
JonathanTurley
MARCH 24, 2022
We previously discussed concerns over free speech on the campus of the University of North Texas, including the canceling of an event on child gender transitioning. Judge Sean Jordan ruled that Professor Hiers may proceed to trial on his free speech claim. ” The University of North Texas and President Neal J.
JonathanTurley
MAY 25, 2021
We have been discussing the state laws requiring contractors and employees to swear that they do not support the the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (“BDS”) movement against Israel. I have long maintained that the law is unconstitutional as a limitation of free speech and associational rights. In NAACP v. Recently, the U.S.
JonathanTurley
SEPTEMBER 9, 2022
Lucero of the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. I will be joined by two distinguished academics: Professor Elizabeth Sepper, University of Texas at Austin School of Law and Professor John Yoo, University of California Berkeley School of Law. the Court handed down two major such rulings. In the last term.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
52 
Let's personalize your content