JonathanTurley

SEPTEMBER 9, 2022

Lucero of the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. I will be joined by two distinguished academics: Professor Elizabeth Sepper, University of Texas at Austin School of Law and Professor John Yoo, University of California Berkeley School of Law. the Court handed down two major such rulings. In the last term.

Court Rules 32

Court Rules Court Laws Constitutional Law 32

JonathanTurley

SEPTEMBER 2, 2023

We recently discussed a federal court ruling that the Texas law requiring age verification and warning for porn sites was unconstitutional. Now, Judge Timothy Brooks in Arkansas has found that another state law imposing age verification requirements for social media violates the First Amendment.

Laws 37

Laws Court Statute Attorney 37

JonathanTurley

AUGUST 15, 2021

Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas delivered a blow to the Biden Administration on Friday by ordering the reinstatement of the Trump-era Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP) program, also known as the “Remain-in-Mexico” policy. 337; Texas, 809 F.3d

Court 76

Court Immigration Court Rules Litigation 76

JonathanTurley

DECEMBER 13, 2021

Below is my column in the Hill on the call by the Biden White House and many in the media to pass the Women’s Health Protection Act (WHPA) in light of the recent decision of the Supreme Court not to enjoin the new abortion law in Texas. The surprise over the Supreme Court’s procedural decision is itself surprising.

Laws 37

Laws Court Rules Court Litigation 37

JonathanTurley

DECEMBER 17, 2021

In California, Newsom pledged to re-purpose the Texas “heartbeat law” to limit gun rights. Newsom’s gun ‘heartbeat’ law. Newsom tapped into the liberal rage after the Supreme Court refused to enjoin the Texas law that allows people to sue anyone who “aids or abets” an abortion performed after about six weeks.

Immigration 33

Immigration Laws Court Sports 33

JonathanTurley

JULY 9, 2022

Below is my column in the Hill on the effort to declare an “invasion” along the Texas border to allow the state to take greater control along the border to stem the flow of illegal immigrants. This week, Texas Gov. Indeed, in this month’s ruling in Biden v. United States. Here is the column: “We’re being invaded.”

Immigration 33

Immigration Government Court Laws 33

JonathanTurley

JANUARY 10, 2024

He is also accused of implementing Biden policy changes that removed barriers to migrants, including rescinding the “Stay in Mexico” rule. Some of us have also questioned his integrity , particularly in controversies like the false claims that border agents whipped migrants in Texas. That was Secretary of War William Belknap in 1876.

Misdemeanor 40

Misdemeanor Immigration Tort Laws 40

JonathanTurley

NOVEMBER 29, 2021

The oral argument is scheduled for December 1st, the same week that the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit will hear an expedited appeal over the even more stringent Texas abortion law. Indeed, the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was a critic of Roe , seeing it as too sweeping in supplanting state laws.

Stare Decisis 37

Stare Decisis Court Laws Law School 37

JonathanTurley

MAY 9, 2021

However, a court cannot condition parental custody on a parent curtailing their political speech or removing symbols reflecting their cultural or political viewpoints. . While all license plates unquestionably contain some government speech (e.g.,

Court 47

Court Government Court Decisions Court Rules 47

JonathanTurley

JANUARY 3, 2022

Wade and return the area to the states, it is more likely that the court will increase the authority of the states while recognizing constitutional protections for such reproductive rights. After Dobbs was accepted, advocates sought to enjoin a Texas law that banned abortion after just six weeks. Gun rights.

Court 43

Court Litigation Litigating Laws 43

JonathanTurley

OCTOBER 3, 2021

While the media and politicians were decrying the recent Texas abortion law and misrepresenting the Court’s order in that case , the real and immediate threat to Roe v. Dobbs involves a challenge to a 2018 Mississippi law that banned most abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy. Penal Law § 400.00(2)(f)

Court 38

Court Court Rules Laws Education 38

JonathanTurley

JUNE 3, 2022

Below is my column in The Hill on the calls for gun bans after the massacre in Uvalde, Texas. The massacre has already been used as the basis for calls to end the filibuster, pack the court, limits on gun ownership, and outright bans. The rhetoric is again outstripping the reality of constitutional and practical limits for gun control.

Court 44

Court Government Court Rules Litigation 44

JonathanTurley

JUNE 9, 2022

Despite the pledge to return to a respect for the “rule of law,” Biden openly suggested that they could use the litigation to get as much money out the door as possible before being barred by the courts. Nothing could be more damaging to the litigation and the federal courts quickly rejected the CDC and Tribe arguments.

Court 44

Court Litigation Litigating Court Rules 44

JonathanTurley

SEPTEMBER 17, 2021

The Administration lost a number of unilateral moves by Biden on the basis of the Administrative Procedures Act (APA), a law requiring the government to consider objections and countervailing facts before making final decisions. Right on cue, Biden immediately to did exactly what Trump did in discarding the federal law.

Court 38

Court Laws Immigration Legal 38

JonathanTurley

JULY 15, 2022

.” Ironically, it was the only part of the president’s remarks that is consistent with what the court actually said in its decision in Dobbs v. Wade, the court ruled that millions of citizens, not nine justices, must now decide the question of abortion. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. In overturning Roe v.

Court 35

Court Laws Court Rules Legal 35

JonathanTurley

MAY 24, 2021

So a ruling by a federal district court in Texas this week was particularly jarring: Judge Reed O’Connor found that the Biden administration engaged in systemic gender and race discrimination to implement COVID-19 relief for American restaurants. Courts have allowed minority set-asides to remedy past inequities.

Court 59

Court Government Small Business Court Rules 59

JonathanTurley

DECEMBER 9, 2020

The lawsuit not only contradicts governing case law but threatens constitutional protections for free speech and the free press in seeking such tort relief. From the outset, the complaint collides with controlling case law. The Court in cases like New York Times v. Count IV is a civil conspiracy claim. Take Count II.

Tort 34

Tort Lawyer Lawyers Court Rules 34

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

AUGUST 4, 2021

Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. Washington Supreme Court Said Climate Activist Was Entitled to Present Necessity Defense Based on Evidence that Legal Alternatives Were Not “Truly Reasonable”.

Court 40

Court Litigation Litigating Government 40

JonathanTurley

DECEMBER 5, 2021

Jackson Women’s Health Organization, a challenge to the Mississippi abortion law. The statement seemed directed at Sotomayor’s three new colleagues and the effort to use the new court composition to seek the reduction or overturning of Roe v. Here is the column: In Wednesday’s Supreme Court oral argument in Dobbs v.

Stare Decisis 8

Stare Decisis Court Laws Legal 8