article thumbnail

US Supreme Court rules for student in campus free speech case

JURIST

Preczewski in favor of a former Georgia college student in a campus free speech case. In 2016, Chike Uzuegbunam, an Evangelical Christian, attempted to express and share his faith on the Georgia Gwinnett College Campus by standing near the campus library and passing out literature. The US Supreme Court ruled 8-1 Monday in Uzuegbunam v.

article thumbnail

CHICKEN!

NewmanFerraraLLP

Ultimately, Parker hopes to recover compensatory damages, restitution, punitive damages, legal fees, and costs, together with a judicial declaration as to the parties’ rights and responsibilities. ” ( Complaint , paragraph 1.) ” ( Complaint , paragraph 101.)

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Case preview: Justices to consider effect of change in government policy on cases seeking symbolic damages

SCOTUSBlog

Preczewski , a dispute over religious speech on the grounds of a Georgia college, but the court’s ruling could have implications well beyond academia. Moreover, the students add, these kinds of policies rarely cause the kind of harm for which students can recover compensatory damages. Background.

article thumbnail

Argument analysis: Justices weigh mootness after change in government policy in cases seeking nominal damages

SCOTUSBlog

The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Tuesday in the case of a Georgia student who was stopped from handing out religious literature and speaking about his faith on the campus of his public college. Alito pressed Pinson, asking whether an award of $10 in statutory damages would be large enough for the lawsuit to go forward.

article thumbnail

SCOTUS Rules Students Have Standing to Bring Free Speech Suit

Constitutional Law Reporter

According to the Court, a request for nominal damages satisfies the redressability element necessary for Article III standing where a plaintiff’s claim is based on a completed violation of a legal right. This case asks whether an award of nominal damages by itself can redress a past injury. Facts of the Case. Supreme Court’s Decision.