Remove Administrative Law Remove Immigration Remove Litigating Remove Litigation
article thumbnail

Litigation continues over public charge immigration rule

SCOTUSBlog

Last term, the court dismissed as improvidently granted, or “DIG”ed , a case brought by Republican-controlled states challenging the government’s repeal of a Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule. The post Litigation continues over public charge immigration rule appeared first on SCOTUSblog.

article thumbnail

Divided court declines to reinstate Biden’s immigration guidelines, sets case for argument this fall

SCOTUSBlog

Share The Supreme Court will again weigh the executive branch’s authority to set immigration policy as some red states claim that the Biden administration’s enforcement decisions are too lax. immigration policy generally, describing a “corrosive disrespect” by DHS for the rule of law and characterizing the U.S.-Mexico

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Justices probe states’ effort to defend Trump immigration rule after Biden stopped defending it in court

SCOTUSBlog

Share The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Wednesday in a case involving whether a group of states can defend a contentious Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule after the Biden administration refused to do so. alleging that the repeal of the law violated federal administrative law.

article thumbnail

The ‘Unexamined Law of Deportation’

The Crime Report

But a Stanford University researcher argues that basing deportation decisions of immigrants on the level of criminality without looking at the length of time they have been in the U.S. disrupts families and turns immigration services into a vehicle for crime control. longer, they are disrupting families with stronger ties to the U.S.,

article thumbnail

Justices decline to reach merits of conservative states’ attempt to revive public charge rule

SCOTUSBlog

Share The Supreme Court on Wednesday threw out an effort by Arizona and 12 other states with Republican attorneys general to defend a contentious Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule after the Biden administration refused to do so. In February, the Biden administration formally proposed a replacement rule.

article thumbnail

Court will confront jurisdictional jumble in the case of a transgender woman seeking relief from deportation

SCOTUSBlog

Share The nation’s immigration courts are breaking under the cumulative weight of a byzantine statutory scheme, chronic understaffing, and insurmountable case backlogs. She was detained and subsequently applied for a type of humanitarian relief known as “withholding of removal” under the Immigration & Nationality Act.

article thumbnail

An alarmist take on the Supreme Court’s agenda

SCOTUSBlog

Millhiser illustrates this thesis with a whirlwind tour of four key areas: the right to vote, administrative law, religion and the right to sue. Even so, I am skeptical that the court will alter the law as dramatically as Millhiser fears. “The Carolene Products settlement in favor of democracy is now in tatters,” he writes.