JURIST

JUNE 12, 2022

A US federal judge Friday granted a request to dismiss a policy by President Joe Biden’s administration that narrows the detaining and deportation of immigrants. ” The opinion continues to state that the memo violates “a foundational principle of administrative law.”

Immigration 104

Immigration Administrative Law Court Laws 104

SCOTUSBlog

DECEMBER 31, 2020

Innovation Law Lab , a challenge to the Trump administration’s “remain in Mexico” policy, which allows the Department of Homeland Security to return immigrants seeking asylum to Mexico while they wait for an asylum hearing in U.S. immigration courts. Alcaraz-Enriquez (Feb. California (Feb. Saul & Davis v. Saul (Mar.

Calendaring 136

Calendaring Immigration Misdemeanor Construction 136

SCOTUSBlog

JULY 21, 2022

Share The Supreme Court will again weigh the executive branch’s authority to set immigration policy as some red states claim that the Biden administration’s enforcement decisions are too lax. immigration policy generally, describing a “corrosive disrespect” by DHS for the rule of law and characterizing the U.S.-Mexico

Immigration 145

Immigration Court Government Court Rules 145

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 29, 2022

Share The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Tuesday in a challenge to a Biden administration policy that prioritizes certain groups of unauthorized immigrants for arrest and deportation. District Judge Drew Tipton agreed with the states that the policy violates federal law and vacated it nationwide.

Immigration 106

Immigration Government Court Administrative Law 106

SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 28, 2022

Share The Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Tuesday in a dispute over the Biden administration’s authority to set immigration policy. Texas and Louisiana are challenging a federal policy that prioritizes certain groups of unauthorized immigrants for arrest and deportation, arguing that it violates federal law.

Immigration 103

Immigration Government Healthcare Court 103

Law 360

JUNE 16, 2023

Department of Justice Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer proceedings against the retailer for alleged violations of immigration-related record-keeping requirements, saying the administrative law judge overseeing the matter is "unconstitutionally shielded from presidential supervision."

Immigration 40

Immigration Administrative Law Laws 40

The Crime Report

OCTOBER 12, 2021

Under current laws, noncitizens convicted of serious crimes are deported. But a Stanford University researcher argues that basing deportation decisions of immigrants on the level of criminality without looking at the length of time they have been in the U.S. In a forthcoming paper published in the Georgetown Law Journal, David K.

Immigration 105

Immigration Laws Felony Attorney 105

SCOTUSBlog

OCTOBER 7, 2022

Last term, the court dismissed as improvidently granted, or “DIG”ed , a case brought by Republican-controlled states challenging the government’s repeal of a Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule. The post Litigation continues over public charge immigration rule appeared first on SCOTUSblog.

Immigration 83

Immigration Litigation Litigating Administrative Law 83

SCOTUSBlog

FEBRUARY 23, 2022

Share The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Wednesday in a case involving whether a group of states can defend a contentious Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule after the Biden administration refused to do so. alleging that the repeal of the law violated federal administrative law.

Immigration 93

Immigration Court Administrative Law Government 93

JURIST

OCTOBER 3, 2022

He reminded his audience that “it was in our 2019 Manifesto that we laid out what we will update in the Human Rights Act and administrative law to ensure that there is a proper balance between the rights of individuals, our vital national security and effective government.”.

Laws 183

Laws Government Legal Services Immigration 183

JURIST

FEBRUARY 21, 2022

The Biden administration seeks a declaration that it may cease enforcement of the “Remain in Mexico” immigration policy first implemented by former President Trump. First, the Trump administration relied on 8 USC § 1225(b)(2)(C) to institute the MPP. Respondent must file their brief on April 7, 2022.

Immigration 161

Immigration Court Government Administrative Law 161

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 7, 2022

Texas presents the latest stage in the Biden administration’s attempt to unwind the Trump administration’s “remain in Mexico” policy. immigration court. solicitor general argues that the statutory basis for the Trump administration’s policy, 8 U.S.C. Texas abortion law. The law, S.B.

Laws 125

Laws Immigration Court Administrative Law 125

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 1, 2021

Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, which had previously taken asylum seekers’ testimony as credible when reviewing cases where immigration courts were silent on applicants’ credibility. The asylum seekers, meanwhile, argued that administrative law principles supported the lower court’s approach.

Immigration 145

Immigration Government Administrative Law Court 145

JURIST

FEBRUARY 25, 2021

The main issue before the court is”[w]hether a court of appeals may conclusively presume that an asylum applicant’s testimony is credible and true whenever an immigration judge or the Board of Immigration Appeals adjudicates an application without making an explicit adverse credibility determination.”

Court 117

Court Immigration Administrative Law Government 117

Customs & International Trade Law

APRIL 29, 2022

Here is a recap of the latest customs and international trade law news: FDA. Immigration and Customs Enforcement-Homeland Security Investigations (ICE-HSI) special agents for further investigation. The post Customs and Trade Law Weekly Snapshot appeared first on Customs & International Trade Law Blog.

Laws 87

Laws Drafting Calendaring Administrative Law 87

SCOTUSBlog

AUGUST 20, 2021

Share The Biden administration on Friday asked the Supreme Court for an immediate reprieve from having to reinstate a Trump-era program known as the “remain in Mexico” policy, which requires asylum seekers at the U.S.-Mexico immigration court. Mexico border to stay in Mexico while they wait for a hearing in U.S.

Immigration 103

Immigration Government Court Administrative Law 103

Law 360

JUNE 8, 2021

workers based on their citizenship by hoarding thousands of jobs for temporary visa holders, an administrative law judge has ruled, finding that the Executive Office for Immigration Review is the correct forum for the federal government's allegations. Facebook Inc. must face claims that it discriminated against U.S.

Immigration 40

Immigration Administrative Law Government Laws 40

Customs & International Trade Law

AUGUST 26, 2022

Here is a recap of the latest customs and international trade law news: Office of U.S. On August 21, CBP announced McAllen Border Patrol Station agents attempted to initiate an immigration inspection of the occupants of a vehicle departing a well-known migrant loading area in Los Ebanos. Trade Representative . The Office of the U.S.

Laws 52

Laws Immigration Administrative Law Attorney 52

SCOTUSBlog

MARCH 31, 2023

To enforce these laws, Congress created the SEC. It granted the agency the power to regulate investors through either lawsuits in federal court or internal hearings in front of an administrative law judge, or ALJ. Under federal law, investors may challenge only final internal decisions by the SEC in the courts of appeals.

Immigration 94

Immigration Administrative Law Government Court 94

JonathanTurley

DECEMBER 2, 2020

This afternoon I have the pleasure of joining a distinguished panel to speak on the Supreme Court at the University of Southern California’s Gould School of Law. The event is part of the LACBA Business Law Section 2020 Virtual Institute for Corporate Counsel and will also include Michael J. It will also include Beth S.

Law School 32

Law School Laws Court Immigration 32

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 15, 2022

Share The Supreme Court on Wednesday threw out an effort by Arizona and 12 other states with Republican attorneys general to defend a contentious Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule after the Biden administration refused to do so. The case, Arizona v.

Immigration 94

Immigration Government Administrative Law Court 94

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 14, 2023

Share The nation’s immigration courts are breaking under the cumulative weight of a byzantine statutory scheme, chronic understaffing, and insurmountable case backlogs. She was detained and subsequently applied for a type of humanitarian relief known as “withholding of removal” under the Immigration & Nationality Act.

Immigration 75

Immigration Court Government Statute 75

SCOTUSBlog

JUNE 29, 2023

22-510 Issue : Whether, when officers put a handcuffed and shackled person face-down on the floor and pushed into his back until he died, they are they entitled to qualified immunity as a matter of law because the person struggled to breathe before dying. Louis, Mo. , relisted after the June 22 conference) N.S.

Immigration 77

Immigration Court Government Laws 77

SCOTUSBlog

MAY 20, 2021

Millhiser illustrates this thesis with a whirlwind tour of four key areas: the right to vote, administrative law, religion and the right to sue. In addition, even during the past 10 years, Congress has enacted a number of significant laws, including tax reforms and the gargantuan spending bills of the past year and a half.

Administrative Law 141

Administrative Law Court Immigration Laws 141

Attorney at Work

MARCH 14, 2022

Ask a Law Librarian. A visit to a law library is an ideal way to start. That could be anything from an immigration petition to a blue sky filing. For example, an interest in big pharma could lead you to sources about health law, antitrust, mass torts, consumer protection, and science and technology. You’re smart.

Education 113

Education Legal Legal Lawyer 113

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

OCTOBER 19, 2023

The Scramble to Identify Major Questions in Administrative Law In its June 2022 decision in West Virginia v. The challenge of meeting changing conditions in administrative law is known as the pacing problem: scientific and technological developments will nearly always outstrip the pace of government oversight. Env’t Prot.

Statute 81

Statute Court Government Administrative Law 81