article thumbnail

Immigration, takings, administrative law and the kitchen sink

SCOTUSBlog

Share The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. The last scheduled conference of the Supreme Court’s term — which this term is being held Thursday — is usually one that yields many grants. citizen for a benefit under state law.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court to decide whether insurrection provision keeps Trump off ballot

SCOTUSBlog

Share The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Thursday in what is shaping up to be the biggest election case since its ruling nearly 25 years ago in Bush v. Although the question comes to the court in a case from Colorado, the impact of the court’s ruling could be much more far-reaching. 6, 2021, attacks on the U.S.

Court 145
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Vaccine Cases Step Out of the Shadows at High Court

SquirePattonBoggs

An important development occurred yesterday evening in both the OSHA and CMS vaccine mandate cases pending before the Supreme Court. The Court took the very rare step of scheduling a special hearing for both sets of cases. The challengers in the other case are a coalition of ten states led by Missouri.

Court 81
article thumbnail

When do legal observers at protests get First Amendment protection?

SCOTUSBlog

Share The Petitions of the Week column highlights a selection of cert petitions recently filed in the Supreme Court. Louis, Missouri. A federal district court in Missouri ruled that Molina and Vogel’s claims could go to a jury, rejecting the officers’ argument that they were entitled to qualified immunity. In Molina v.

Legal 94
article thumbnail

Biden administration seeks quick relief from restoring “remain in Mexico” policy

SCOTUSBlog

Share The Biden administration on Friday asked the Supreme Court for an immediate reprieve from having to reinstate a Trump-era program known as the “remain in Mexico” policy, which requires asylum seekers at the U.S.-Mexico immigration court. The court agreed in October 2020 to review a ruling by the U.S.

article thumbnail

“Remain in Mexico” and Texas’ anti-abortion law

SCOTUSBlog

immigration court. After Texas and Missouri challenged that decision, a federal district court vacated the secretary’s termination, in part on the administrative-law ground that the decision was insufficiently explained. The law, S.B. Remain in Mexico” policy. As the case proceeded to an appeal in the U.S.

Laws 125
article thumbnail

Justices delve into a trio of thorny issues in states’ challenge to federal immigration policy

SCOTUSBlog

Share The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Tuesday in a challenge to a Biden administration policy that prioritizes certain groups of unauthorized immigrants for arrest and deportation. Texas and Louisiana went to federal court in Texas to challenge the policy.