An alarmist take on the Supreme Court’s agenda
SCOTUSBlog
MAY 20, 2021
The book is unlikely to change many minds, however, because it betrays the very fault of which it accuses the court: It advances a vision of correct decision-making rooted more in partisan policy preferences than in neutral legal criteria. Even so, I am skeptical that the court will alter the law as dramatically as Millhiser fears.
138 
Let's personalize your content