Administrative Law Attorney Court Manufacturing 
The Fashion Law
DECEMBER 9, 2021
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the Supreme Court, in which Nike claims that adidas also came up short. Unlike district court litigation, which can take several years to reach a trial date, a case filed before the ITC can proceed to an evidentiary hearing before an administrative law judge in eight to nine months.”.
SCOTUSBlog
JANUARY 20, 2022
Share The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. At this Friday’s conference, the Supreme Court will thus begin the process of considering what cases to review next fall during October Term 2022. The district court and U.S. What’s the difference ?
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Customs & International Trade Law
OCTOBER 28, 2022
DOC is rescinding the administrative review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on certain non-refillable steel cylinders (non-refillable cylinders) from the People’s Republic China (China), covering the period August 28, 2020, though December 31, 2021. . DOC announced on October 9, 2019, in the U.S. Limited (‘‘Top Golf’’) in default.
Customs & International Trade Law
NOVEMBER 4, 2022
DOC , through the Office of Trade and Economic Analysis (‘‘OTEA’’) of the International Trade Administration, has received an application for an amended Export Trade Certificate of Review (‘‘Certificate’’). . If you have questions about these updates, contact our Diaz Trade Law attorneys at info@diaztradelaw.com or call us at 305-456-3830.
Customs & International Trade Law
OCTOBER 21, 2022
manufacturers and supplied them to Russian end-users. USITC has determined not to review two initial determinations (‘‘IDs’’) of the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’): (1) Order No. If you have questions about these updates, contact our Diaz Trade Law attorneys at info@diaztradelaw.com or call us at 305-456-3830.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
MARCH 13, 2023
Following the 2007 landmark Supreme Court case Massachusetts v. These emissions standards were significantly loosened in the last year of the Trump Administration. In 2021 the Biden Administration reversed the Trump-era rollbacks and instituted the strictest-ever vehicle GHG emissions standards in a move aimed at preventing 3.1
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
OCTOBER 19, 2023
In the year since the Supreme Court embraced the “major questions doctrine” (MQD), industry and Republican state attorneys general have argued that federal regulations ranging from stricter vehicle emissions standards to climate change disclosures must be struck down under its banner. Env’t Prot.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
67 
Let's personalize your content