SCOTUSBlog

NOVEMBER 29, 2022

Share The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Tuesday in a challenge to a Biden administration policy that prioritizes certain groups of unauthorized immigrants for arrest and deportation. The policy at the center of the case is set forth in a September 2021 memorandum by Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas.

Immigration 106

Immigration Government Court Administrative Law 106

SCOTUSBlog

OCTOBER 7, 2022

Last term, the court dismissed as improvidently granted, or “DIG”ed , a case brought by Republican-controlled states challenging the government’s repeal of a Trump-era immigration policy known as the “public charge” rule. Two months into the Biden administration, the government took an unusual step.

Immigration 83

Immigration Litigation Litigating Administrative Law 83

SCOTUSBlog

JANUARY 7, 2022

immigration court. In June 2021, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas of the Department of Homeland Security issued a decision terminating the policy. solicitor general argues that the statutory basis for the Trump administration’s policy, 8 U.S.C. Texas abortion law. In her cert petition, the U.S.

Laws 125

Laws Immigration Court Administrative Law 125

ClimateChange-ClimateLaw

OCTOBER 19, 2023

The Scramble to Identify Major Questions in Administrative Law In its June 2022 decision in West Virginia v. The challenge of meeting changing conditions in administrative law is known as the pacing problem: scientific and technological developments will nearly always outstrip the pace of government oversight. Env’t Prot.

Statute 81

Statute Court Government Administrative Law 81