LawTechnologyToday
JUNE 21, 2021
On March 11, 2021, the esteemed Christie’s auction house sold a digital artwork (titled Everydays ) by an artist named Beeple for $69,346,250 USD. Most likely, it will take a couple of room-clearing court decisions to help owners and litigants navigate their waters. Strange, to say the least. About the Author.
FDA Law Blog
AUGUST 29, 2021
As a matter of administrative law, the Brand Memo made good sense from the perspective of FDA-regulated industry, as we described here. The memorandum cites the 2019 Supreme Court decision, Kisor v. This policy, announced by then Associate Attorney General Rachel Brand in 2018 was referred to as the Brand Memo.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Constitutional Law Reporter
MAY 30, 2023
In such actions where the Commission elects to institute administrative proceedings to address statutory violations, it typically delegates the initial adjudication to an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) with authority to resolve motions, hold a hearing, and then issue a decision. Citing Carr v. Saul , 593 U.S.
FDA Law Blog
JANUARY 15, 2024
Koblitz — You know a court decision is going to be worth reading when the judges compare FDA’s regulatory governance of flavored e-cigarettes to a Shakespearean gaslighting. In August 2021, FDA issued a press release announcing the denial of 55,000 flavored e-cigarette applications en masse. By David B. Clissold & Sara W.
ClimateChange-ClimateLaw
JULY 2, 2021
Having found that the factors for a preliminary injunction were satisfied, the court also found that the injunction should be nationwide in scope due to the need for uniformity. June 15, 2021). On June 30, the Wyoming federal court denied the motions without prejudice, finding that they were “materially moot.” June 16, 2021).
JURIST
JUNE 27, 2023
Harper that the “ independent legislature ” election theory, which has been the legal foundation for many of the recent Republican-led efforts to change election administration law and overturn 2020 election results, is an invalid interpretation of the Election Clause of the Constitution.
SCOTUSBlog
JUNE 15, 2022
In a brief unsigned ruling , the justices dismissed the case as “improvidently granted” – an unusual procedural move indicating that the court concluded it was wrong to have taken up the dispute in the first place. It then rescinded the rule without seeking public comments on its decision to do so. The states went to the U.S.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
140 
Let's personalize your content