Sat.Apr 20, 2024 - Fri.Apr 26, 2024

Remove criminal-law-statute
article thumbnail

California prosecutors charge three Alameda police officers with involuntary manslaughter of detainee Mario Gonzalez in 2021

JURIST

That statute criminalizes “the unlawful killing of a human being without malice … in the commission of a lawful act which might product death, in an unlawful manner, or without due caution and circumspection.”

Attorney 210
article thumbnail

Supreme Court says “no” to anti-tax appeal, requires Court of Appeal to take another look at dog attack case

At the Lectern

5th 993, 1015 [‘The assertion that a special relationship is required misapprehends our case law’].” The statute provides a 25-years-to-life sentence for various sexual offenses during the commission of certain burglaries. Criminal case grant-and-holds. Victory Woodworks, Inc. 2023) 14 Cal.5th

Court 45
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

RICO injury, federal jurisdiction, and giving veterans the benefit of the doubt

SCOTUSBlog

They alleged violation of Missouri’s antitrust and consumer-protection laws, and that defendants had been unjustly enriched, among other things. Royal Canin and Purina, the pet-food makers, removed the case to federal court, arguing that the antitrust and unjust enrichment claims implicated federal law issues. Last up is Bufkin v.

Felony 106
article thumbnail

The Constitutional Abyss: Justices Signal a Desire to Avoid Both Cliffs on Presidential Immunity

JonathanTurley

Nixon, the court ruled a president is not immune from a criminal subpoena. Since then, the court has avoided any significant ruling on the extension of immunity to a criminal case — until now. It would leave a president largely unaccountable under the criminal code for any criminal acts.

article thumbnail

US Supreme Court hears oral arguments in Idaho abortion ban case

JURIST

The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments Wednesday in the case concerning whether a 1986 federal law preempts Idaho’s near-total abortion ban. The Idaho statute criminalizes performing or attempting to perform an abortion unless not doing so would result in the mother’s death.

Court 219
article thumbnail

Supreme Court divided over federal-state conflict on emergency abortion ban

SCOTUSBlog

Share The Supreme Court on Wednesday was divided over whether a federal law requiring hospitals that participate in Medicare to provide “necessary stabilizing treatment” in an emergency overrides an Idaho law that bars most abortions. The federal law at the center of the case is known as the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act.

Court 145
article thumbnail

Supreme Court appears likely to side with Trump on some presidential immunity

SCOTUSBlog

Share The Supreme Court on Thursday appeared skeptical of a ruling by a federal appeals court that rejected former President Donald Trump’s claim that he has absolute immunity from criminal charges based on his official acts as president. Why, she asked, would the president not be required to follow the law when performing his official acts?

Court 145